Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center

On March 12, 2010, in Uncategorized, by admin

www.rcac.purdue.edu Researchers at Purdue University have created a simulation that uses scientific principles to study in detail what likely happened when a commercial airliner crashed into the World Trade Center’s North Tower on Sept. 11, 2001. Researchers: Chris Hoffmann – Faculty Sami Kilic – Former Member Scott Meador Voicu Popescu – Faculty Paul Rosen – [...]

  • Share/Bookmark


www.rcac.purdue.edu Researchers at Purdue University have created a simulation that uses scientific principles to study in detail what likely happened when a commercial airliner crashed into the World Trade Center’s North Tower on Sept. 11, 2001. Researchers: Chris Hoffmann – Faculty Sami Kilic – Former Member Scott Meador Voicu Popescu – Faculty Paul Rosen – Graduate Student Mete Sozen

  • Share/Bookmark
 

25 Responses to “Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center”

  1. nasafakedit says:

    US NWO Govt murdered 3000 Americans
    on 9/11

    TREASON

    INSIDE JOB

    FALSE FLAG

  2. nasafakedit says:

    This video is pure BULLSHIT

  3. DSAEY says:

    I BET YOU HAVE NO IDEAR what your saying lmfao

  4. SerieThriller says:

    How do you do this vidéo editing ? sorry for the vocabulary if it’s not correct but the english is not my first languages i’m french so …

  5. EdjeBos says:

    Ever seen pictures of a pancake collapse? This is whats left of TWO of the largest buildings in the world.
    watch?v=XtrUORPdvOs
    They were levelled to the ground. There should have been large mounts of concrete and steel. In the vid you can see that you can walk at ground level on the places were moments before stood TWO of the largest buildings in the world. Most demolitions aren’t designed make it look like a collapse. You were spoonfed false info. As was everyone. And swallowed it. At first.

  6. kevkool230 says:

    shane its cool that ur trying to use math but your method is very poor. You neglect the angle of collision, area of contact, the trust and beam systems in the structure, deformation on the beams due to forces and heat, thermodynamics, and much more. it is something you cannot just decide with a simple kinetic energy equation… -_-;;
    you need to do a lot of computational mechanics, dynamics and thermo/fluid dynamics etc etc to get a much much more accurate conclusion…

  7. benpg says:

    @LiCeNSeD6To9KiLL The truth of the matter is that truthers CREATE the culprit they most despise. Arabs and the Anti semitic european press blame the jews, fringe left wingers blame the bush administration, fringe libertarians and right winger isolationists blame the new world order. These so called culprits are manufactured, just like your so called evidence. You want to believe that it’s true, so you manufacture it to be so.

  8. benpg says:

    @LiCeNSeD6To9KiLL Who exactly is “they”? I get a different answer, or no answer at all every time I ask one of you people this question. I’ve heard its the jews, the CIA, the bush administration, the clinton administration, the lizard aliens, the crab people, Iran, and various corporate CEOs. Who is “they”? Who are these supposed people behind the scenes pulling the strings, and why do conspiracy theorists seem unable to come to anything close to a consensus regarding their identity?

  9. LiCeNSeD6To9KiLL says:

    They came to the conclusion they wanted them too tool lol, because they limited their investigation, from every possible angle! Your comment makes absolutely no sense!

  10. Skeptic121 says:

    Why are you rambling? Are you on something? I said nothing about the 767.

  11. brian78045 says:

    Read the current article on NORAD posted at DNotice (org).

    You wont believe your eyes when you read what the 9/11 Commission Report admits about NORAD before and on 9/11:

    “NORAD would receive tracking information for the hijacked aircraft either from joint use radar [unnattended radar] or from the relevant FAA air traffic control facility. Every attempt would be made to have the hijacked aircraft squawk 7500 to help NORAD track it.”

    Pass the article on to 9/11 Truth skeptics.

  12. SSshane6d9 says:

    A tremendous amount of stress on the airframe that the high jackers obviously do not care about. Now do airline company’s want to put there aircraft in tis stress or do the manufacturers want to say that they will. No because of legal issues, just like a ladder that says do not exceede 250lbs. Will it crush if you put 251lbs on the ladder of course not, it will probably hangle over 400lbs. But you wont here the company say that though

  13. SSshane6d9 says:

    @Skeptic121

    Ok well then show me the mathmetical arguments against the official story???? I never heard any besides the one that a 767 caannot fly at 500+ mph at 1000ft altitude. When it can, it just produces a tremendous amount of Stress on the airframe. There was a plane that went down in egypt that was of 757 style I believe that actually broke the sound barrier while in a dive. So the 767 while in a quick dive can stay in the 500 mph range for a short amount of time while just producing

  14. imtoowierdforyou says:

    whenever i see the picture of the tower collasped on the ground, the steel looks like if the planes knocked down a huge crate

  15. westhamm1132 says:

    think conspiraacys carnt be true take a look at these 5 that came true
    conspiracy theories that came true (dot) blogspot (com)

  16. MrTedshackleford says:

    watch?v=FJQRK0JjH70..top down demo

  17. bpisports says:

    @EdjeBos A few bars of steel? Have you ever seen the rubble pile? They had cranes working 24-7 to remove the rubble, its not like their were only pieces that you could pick up and throw away…a large/majority amount of the debris was way too heavy to remove by hand. I love when CTs present false information like this. The towers falling didn’t resemble any controlled demolition I’ve ever seen…CDs fall from the bottom up, the towers fell top, down…I don’t get why people don’t see this.

  18. Skeptic121 says:

    Hello Purdue folks! Nice job on this video. It’s been a couple of years; are you looking for something else to do? How about continuing your simulation to include the collapse?
    What assumptions do you have to make in order to make your simulated collapse resemble the reality?

  19. Skeptic121 says:

    Shane,
    You want math? Have you looked at any of the mathematical arguments against the official story? Do you actually believe they are not there?

  20. cayc1 says:

    Great video man, if you want to see a movie that will blow your mind type into youtube old world secrets the omega project codes

  21. brian78045 says:

    Read the current article on NORAD posted at DNotice (org).

    You wont believe your eyes when you read what the 9/11 Commission Report admits about NORAD before and on 9/11:

    “NORAD would receive tracking information for the hijacked aircraft either from joint use radar [unnattended radar] or from the relevant FAA air traffic control facility. Every attempt would be made to have the hijacked aircraft squawk 7500 to help NORAD track it.”

    Pass the article on to 9/11 Truth skeptics.

  22. invanz0 says:

    not hunted down and killed. In fact bbc interviewed one of the guys who was accused of having hijacking one of the planes. and the 9-11 commission report did not change. the facts change, but the report stays the same? america is a dictator ship. bushed dad was head of cia, apart of operation zapata, bay of the pigs, connected to the jfk assassination by hoover(very good detective). its amazing how shit gets brushed under the rug

  23. invanz0 says:

    attack america before 9-11 and they took him to court.(obvious he didnt show) and provided evidence against him. we didnt do that on 9-11. why? so many traditional methods for finding out what happen and how and why were thrown out the window. it seem like the power new what they were doing and already had the list of 13 terrorist who took part in 9-11. 5/13 found innosent and alive in the middle east. 2 of 5 were the ones who hijacked the planes. When proven alive in the middle east they were

  24. invanz0 says:

    continued 2* oil and have a sold weapons and supplys to both iraq and afghanistan. FOr example night vision goggles, and updated version of an sa-7 which is a heat seaking missle thats fired from the shoulder, armor piercing rounds and im sure a bunch of other stuff we dont know about.9-11 led to the patriot act. Which puts to sleep the 4th amendment. Which is one of the most important ones. the cia gave weapons and money to osama in the late 70′s early 80′s to fight communism. And he tried to

  25. invanz0 says:

    countinued* 9-10 got rich after 9-11? someone has to build tanks and weapons, they get rich. in the golf war in 1991 “insurgents” were burning a bunch of oil fields so the prices went up. We need to protect the fuel of the usa but the world. How come america cares so much about iraq when north korea HAS nukes. AND HAS long range missles? they made iraq sound like the worse place on earth with all those “wmds.” What country does israel and america not like? iran, they own a 3rd of the worlds

Leave a Reply

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...